Aside from the claim of contradictions, most objections to the Bible are not actually problems at all from a logical perspective. For example, suppose that someone claims, “The Bible can’t be trusted because it contains accounts of miracles, and miracles are clearly impossible.” This argument is not rationally sound because it begs the question. Clearly, an all-powerful God as described in the Bible would be capable of doing miracles. Thus, by merely assuming that miracles are impossible, the critic has already dismissed the possibility that the Bible is true. His argument is circular. The critic is essentially arguing that the Bible is false because the Bible is false. Read the full article here…



This is an interesting article, but i think the author has made one large error. Ultimately it is a matter of faith. When you look at the divine design in this universe, it is impossible for the sun to go backward, and for a donkey to speak and so on. The Bible even tells us that faith due to sight isn’t faith at all. There is no evidence that these things happened or that they even can happen, therefore, we see Him though an eye of faith.
And as we PB’s understand that’s not something that I can just give someone. The Lord has to born them of his spirit and give them that initial spiritual eye and faith for them or other to help them develop it.
I agree with that.